A Challenge to Change. From Superman to Man of Steel. June 19, 2013Posted by @Karen_Fu in change, real power, video.
Tags: change, Christopher Reeves, Henry Cavill, Man Of Steel, movie impact on children and adult audiences, Movies, peace, Superman, violence
add a comment
‘You are not ALONE‘ Zod
‘And WE shall see you again.’ Me
I am pretty SURE there will be a sequel. If there’s none, I would be very surprised if there isn’t.
I was making a mickey out from the lines in the movie set by the monster Zod. I have no means to see him again! As I was watching the film with the other hundreds in the theatre, I quietly look on the multi languages on the screen. And I look at Perry White, who is played by Laurence Fishburne. The first African American to have the role, while Henry Cavill is the first Briton to take on this role as the Man of Steel.
Anyway, the change of taste is obvious. This is probably my favourite trailer unless someone out there could give a better one. It practically summarises everything up in half a minute.
Michael Shannon’s villain look of General ‘maniac’ Zod was so hulk-like in appearance compared with the one in Superman 2 some 30 years back. Very monster-like.
Lois Lane has a new style. Played by Amy Adams, she has become the new iconic woman of this new century. The whole notion of gender powers were all over the film, but she was solid. I like her confidence. And finally I don’t have to hear any more screaming in distress, which can be so embarrassing to watch. New age women should not scream: they should be refined, smart and very resolute.
I love the flash backs. Usually many flash backs confuse the audience. This one movie, however, was sharp and clear. Praise Zack Snyder for the renewed portrayal of the popular comic figure that is an American icon. The story now has a refreshing screenplay. Your Oscars are going to line up big for the movie. But I think there is one vital point that should be taken to heart. The amount of violence in the film is a concern.
Amongst the DC comic characters, Superman is usually the top seller. Not hard to see why.
It was the most impressionistic character globally. The character is closer to people and has etched a unique place in audiences from 8 to 80. It has a significant role to play as far as education to the young and the older fans like us too. It’s not just a comic film anymore. It’s even political in many respects.
I was too curious of the film to wait, so I took a nose dive to the theatres soon after its launch in Singapore after reading the reviews online. Many were critical. I watched on several you tube clips and decided to see it myself. A change of costume, props, technology. Didn’t quite like the props for Krypton as it looked way too ancient. But then if you were to see it from DC comics point of view, it was actually perfect-you are supposed to rekindle faithfully from the source material. The film snippets still look good enough for a visit. After all, its took like some 30 years since the last blockbuster in a different era of the last century that we see a remake of a well renown superhero, who came about from a time of distress and the desire for a god send being to save the world. We actually need a real one today. Guess an on screen one would have to do it for now.
I think there is one criticism that should be taken seriously, and that this the film is indeed fraught with violence. Far more than its predecessors who did the son of Krypton. Superman 1 and II were filled with wonders, especially on the second version when audiences get to see colours, love, compassion and far less violence with virtually no one being killed. It had a different notion when the film was made. And i genuinely respect it. Perhaps times now have changed in light for faster and fiercer computer games which offer more action and astounding realistic graphics. People now want more of a cool, solid, macho type of hero. I suspect this renewed factor has a lot to do with a preference for a action packed movies for the last few years.
Superman is an icon of the Americans and it is probably the most recognised figure in DC Comics. It’s probably the most popular comic icon that is seen almost like a real person with millions of fans globally. On the first day of launch, I wasn’t surprised by the huge crowds lining up for tickets. It is still all packed at cinemas despite the added show timings.
People watched on for a reason. When the film speaks volumes of what they want and how they feel. The desire for human freedom and justice in many strong ways. This is why Superman prevails in the minds of many. Of all the super heroes, Superman has always been the most admired hero on the largest global scale. The figure seems to be the industry standard and benchmark for all other superheroes to follow. Its seems to a fiction character that has almost become a real one. Even the cape and costumes too, which fashion starts from the hero that actually has little rational physics behind on how a human structure is able to fly.
Man of steel befits what fans want in a comic icon- the full action, a 100 percent 3D direct portrayal of illustrated comic strips to the on line screen. As I was watching on, I was captivated by the screenplay, how the story lines have been cleverly modified according to the original story. Inevitably, I was comparing Man Of Steel with Superman 1 which first debut in 1978. But I only got to watch that like in the 80s on television in those dqys as a little kiddo. But the impact of that film never left me. In fact the way the late Christopher Reeves had his way with the double character of Superman and Clark Kent was by far the best.
Henry Cavill has developed his own style with the characters. I think the people who decided to take him was a right choice though I never quite get it why would a Briton be playing a typically American character? But I suppose it’s the same with many lead roles for movies anywhere. Miss Porter and Bridget Jones, typical British characters, were played by American actress Renee Zellweger. They turned out fabulous.
Personally I am not a DC comic fan, but I have always preferred superheroes characters on screen to those in illustrated books. And I prefer a more human and humor touch of the film where it touched lives so human with a bit of fun. I supposed times have changed. The style has to change to meet changing fashion. And I like it. But I always feel we must also praise the late actor Christopher Reeves for having successfully etched the defined figure that has been the main benchmark for any actor to run on this red cape hero. From the costume changes to a change in tone to a way more ferocious demeanour of villains and even the man of steel himself. The new film does take audiences into a new redefined dimension. The visuals were always captivating to watch on with no down time. Non of the several flash backs in the film was confusing at all despite showing the complex fight for self identity of the man of steel. It was very clear cut. Kevin Costner’s portrayal of Jonathan Kent was touching. In fact it left a defining impression of true parental love.
The older version fits an older style. The newer, the present style. People have changed and so characters in the movies should follow to meet the changed demands of the audience. If its on a personal level, I would prefer the 80s Superman for the personal touch with the audience. Notice how Christopher Reeves made his own style of having a direct greeting contact with audiences on screen especially towards the end of the movies? I don’t think any actor has done that. It made as though that everyone who is watching it mattered. It creates a close family link to the film, which seems to be why people keep comparing this particular old film with the current one.
The new one oozes strong physical appeal. More gutsy in appearance. Ready to blast. it’s the age of action. And it fits.
The film has plenty of violence which I didn’t exactly prefer. But the visuals were genuinely stunning and intriguing. Henry Cavil is a convincing actor and has clearly developed his style for the character. Another point to make is that the film does seem to lack focus on what style they were suppose to be identified with. It looked like Harry Potter, Star Trek, Batman and Superman all in one. I definitely did not like the music but was refreshed by how the storyline was made. The film lacks human warmth, fun and humour when compared to how Superman was portrayed by Christopher Reeves. The last bit of the new film has a strong hint of favour from Christopher Reeves version of Clarke Kent. It does show how much influence the old film has on future films.
All in all, I suppose it really depends on how one sees it. But the style follows DC Comics. And it fits well for superheroes in that respect as well as DC fans. The storyline was a nice twist to the originals that we know of, making it a good change instead of the expected. Flashbacks were done smoothly. Screenplay was impressive. Design of the costumes and set remains quite subjective. I personally think it was some sort of medieval instead of modern. A strong resemblance to Batman was the immediate reaction. The final ending gave a nice hint that there will be a sequel. Unfortunately before we want to watch on what happens next, the passive but humorous part of Clark Kent disappears into the ending.
I get the feeling Henry Cavill, like the Christopher Reeves, might get to see the Queen someday soon. And I have been wondering why he wasn’t being cast into the daily planet first as Clark Kent. The exact demeanour for Clark Kent more than Superman. I suppose this was the other way to make a difference — doing something out of the usual norm. The whole film is. And to leave that very weeny bit for all to linger on for the next big thing. (and I hope there will be less violence to come with)
Certainly expecting a sequel from Man of Steel.
If I were a DC comic fan, 5 out of 5.
I am more on the educational front, so I will rate it 4 out of 5.
1 down for the violence.
I enclosed a YouTube video talk by the Late Christopher Reeves on his role played in Superman. It’s mainly about violence. I think it’s worth a watch. It’s something for everyone to note about violence in movies and the sheer impact on children and also adults. My take: When the world is already a violent place, wouldn’t superman or the man of steel be promoting peace and with reasonable humor? We are infested with violence in our daily living. The school massacres and the likes are only some good reasons why violence should be seriously looked into especially when movies are made. – Karen Fu PS: I am also enclosing another two clips of the old Superman video for your pleasure.
‘Old’ Superman video 1:
‘Old’ Superman video 2:
Snap shot from Twitter – Long shot on Peace: thoughts from ‘Good Artists Copy; Great Artists Steal.’ March 10, 2010Posted by @Karen_Fu in change, ethics, human quality, life challenges, real power.
Tags: human mind, originality, peace, Twitter
add a comment
‘Good Artists Copy; Great Artists Steal.’ I’d say ‘orignal Masters don’t Bully.’
This was exactly the immediate reaction I have when I caught the link via @dtapscott (Don Tapscott, Author of the book ‘Grown Up Digital’) on Twitter.
Can’t say enough about twitter’s great indexing system. It widens your learning horizon and sends you thinking in depth about the people you interact online and how minds work across the tweets. Everything in digital print and record. Perhaps it would be great to run the real offline world in this format. We might be able to run a better world that way. I have a string of blog posts under draft mode as I have a great tendency to make tonnes of typos if I don’t check more than twice. But it will start to shoot after this post, and I am so compelled to post this now.
It has prompted me on a few main sub topics pertaining harmony via the issue on business/ intellectual property:
-Do we exactly trust people? (or could one choose to mischieviously rip the faces of bad people off ?)
Its common knowledge that in business,or indeed in life in general, people could do all kinds of slander or gossip to try erode their opponent’s credibility. That is why law and regulation come into place to enforce a harmonial order however imperfect the system may be.
It is also common knowledge since human civilisation that human beings dwell on the most cruel war , fights and even murder to vent their pent up anger over what they think they are unfairly treated. So the next question is:
-When can we stop the fights for money, status and integrity? (maybe this is impractical unless we choose to live on high mountains of sheep and cows…)
The only way is via tolerance & stop focusing so much on self. Easier said than done, we might need more an a couple of natural / man made chaos to put everything in world order. Sounds horrific but it seems that the human gene isn’t computated with this idea of thought that it takes 2 to start a quarrel then fight; and a blast of smoke to start a war. Having said so, sometimes silence & no reaction could also start fights too, which also cause many later fights that is based on mannerisms. No one likes empty silence after making a proper request. Fights don’t come from nowhere. It is just a matter of respect that one should have. Bending around on ethics to play around isn’t that very wise but many people do that too. It is not only complex to play with but also the dues are definitely going to be hard to simplify later. There are many different permutations of people; most have double or even multiple agendas, which is why an overwhelmingly complicated system emerges. Why do we do that is beyond me. Perhaps I am way too simple minded but I like being simple. It keeps me young.
-Great people don’t have airs; they don’t bully and they mix with all kinds of people.
Play fair, go straight. Forgive and forget. Forget jealousy and stop keep dwelling on what you don’t have. Be genuinely nice.Your mind will be clear of thoughts, and originality will come through. It is easy to see how and why great men and women are such, because they only have big clear minds that spur great physical health too.
-Masters don’t bully because they only spend time to create useful that benefit themselves and others.
Beware of people who love to gossip especially those with a glib tongue.
And beware of rumours. That is exactly where trouble starts. Use your eyes, use your head.
Change in the usual mental thought of getting even, ‘cos that is how the (individual, national or international) rot starts.
Have this for now; have to fly off for now. Taking this very short break to post. Hope I’ve made sense. More pending blog posts in draft.
PS: I’d wish the weather here is cooler. It’s definitely abnormal but that’s what we have put in. – Karen Fu